Bulls 104, Timberwolves 97: a broken clock is wrong almost always

Zach Harper —  March 25, 2013 — 6 Comments

WolfBull

“A broken clock is right twice a day.”

This is one of those sayings that is supposed to be clever and profound, but all it does is make me irate when people use it as a crutch for a terrible argument. Sure, a broken clock is correct twice a day, unless you’re in the military — then it’s correct only once a day. And the rest of the 1,439 minutes, you’re left looking at a time holder that is incorrect and you start wondering how you can get this clock fixed. Or maybe you’re wondering if you need to get a new clock altogether.

The point is a broken clock needs to be fixed. Depending on the type of clock, it could just need new batteries or it could need to be wound up. Or maybe there is a gear that’s completely disconnected. Regardless, if you want that same clock to work then you need to figure out what’s wrong with it and how to get it back to keeping the intended time. 

Watching the Wolves struggle with the Chicago Bulls Sunday evening, I couldn’t help but notice how off the timing was. Aside from the loose ball in which it felt like Andrei Kirilenko dove for the ball about four times before securing, the Wolves just seemed to be a step slow. The Bulls secured short rebounds and long rebounds before the Wolves could correctly react to the trajectory of the errant shot. The Bulls got to loose balls on the ground before the Wolves could turn them into turnovers and possibly points the other way. If there was a step to be taken, it just looked a split-second too slow.

It started with Andrei Kirilenko. In his five games back, he’s had flashes (he was great against the Suns but they’re not a real basketball team) of being his old self, but he hasn’t been able to put together a string of consistency in any of the games. That could partly be the injury still lingering (sometimes it just flares up again) or it could be a lack of rhythm because of the restriction on minutes. It’s likely a combination of the two for such a heady player that is constantly looking for the ebb and flow of a basketball game to make his mark. He had an extremely tough task of dealing with Luol Deng and he did a good job. But he rarely found a way to make an impact on offense against the Bulls.

We saw similar things with Nikola Pekovic in this game. He had a great second half against Chicago, but his first half seemed like a series of mistimed calculations. He couldn’t find defensive rotations, he missed a couple of passes that he normally catches, and the rebounding just wasn’t good enough as the Bulls completely worked over the Wolves on the boards. In fact, the Bulls just flat-out owned the paint in the first half of the game. In the first 24 minutes of the game, Minnesota had 17 total rebounds and the Bulls had 13 rebounds just on the offensive side. The Wolves made just 9-of-23 on their first half attempts in the paint.

This was enough of a lull in the game to give the Bulls the advantage they needed to maintain the lead and withstand the runs of the Wolves. The second half looked like this team finally figured it all out, in terms of how they needed to attack Chicago. They showed a much better sense of shot selection throughout the game; sometimes it’s just really hard to score against the Bulls’ defense and their system, even if Joakim Noah isn’t playing. Tom Thibodeau plugs in a role player and they adjust what they need to do. It’s something you’d love to see Rick Adelman be able to do when injuries come up, except he hasn’t had much of a chance to implement his system over the first two seasons of his tenure here because of injuries, a lack of practices, and lockout shenanigans.

As frustrating as it is to see your team be beaten by Carlos Boozer and Nate Robinson (they both had fantastic games), there were some encouraging signs from the Pups. They only attempted 12 3-pointers in the game and knocked down six of them. The majority of the attempts were good shots in the flow of the offense. They didn’t really force a whole lot from the perimeter. This is the kind of shooting you’d like to see more of from them. It looked measured and it looked pure, for the most part. We also continue to see the team fight back when faced with adversity. However, there is a problem with that.

The Wolves still haven’t learned how to turn the game on their opponents from the get-go. It seems like they’re still getting down in the first half, fighting back, and coming up short. I’d love to see them come out against a good team with a good system and take the fight to them before they have to realize the fight has been brought to their arena. The players sounded unusually upbeat after the loss, perhaps confident that the second half of basketball was a good sign that the pieces are starting to fit back together. Perhaps as everybody gets more tuned up and we see Chase, AK, and Pek worked back into the rotation without restrictions, it will all begin to make sense.

Or maybe we’ll continue to see a team that always looks like it’s on the cusp of getting it but never actually grasps what is needed to become the team we hope to see.

The positives to take away from this game were Rubio deciding to take on a scoring load and doing so efficiently, Pek playing well in the second half and even looking like he was jumping much quicker than he normally does, the team falling into a zone and making it work against the Bulls’ outside shooting, and Derrick Williams’ continued scoring success. The negatives were the bench struggling early, AK’s slow reactions, poor free throw shooting, and the team getting slaughtered on the boards.

There were times against the Bulls in which the Wolves’ clock seemed to be keeping perfect time. However, there were still too many moments in which I looked at the clock and started wondering what the time really was.

Zach Harper

Posts

6 responses to Bulls 104, Timberwolves 97: a broken clock is wrong almost always

  1. Wasn’t able to see the game, but it’s nice to see that Williams had another good line in the boxscore. Just wondering, however, how much of his recent success is due to being a better option on a bad team, as opposed to actual positive development. He’s shown that he’s capable of putting up lines like that, but can he do it for a winning team? You’d know better than me.

  2. pagingstanleyroberts March 25, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    When it comes to Williams, his scoring improvement is tangible, mainly because he’s finishing much better at the rim. Also, though, he takes more mid-range jump shots and is about as good as he has been in that range in the past (not awesome, but takes a lot of them and makes enough to keep shooting).

    I was at the game and got a little testy because of how fake tough the Bulls are (How is Barea’s infraction on Hinrich worse than the elbow Boozer gave Rubio?), but also because it’s generally passed off as truth that physical play is okay and that the Wolves are the ones who need to adjust. While the Wolves lost the game fair and square and I don’t think a team can allow officiating to affect their performance, that still doesn’t address the central issue: why is this being rewarded?

    I wonder why a guy like Pek, who was whistled a lot in his rookie year, has to adjust to the officials (which he has) while others can do the same things he did and have it considered “part of the game.” Maybe most important in all of this is that Pek could be a great enforcer and help the team reduce some of this chippiness that the other team always instigates and then benefits from, but he’s not allowed the same “liberties” that Gibson/Mohammed/Boozer are.

  3. Williams is a work in progress still but I think he will figure it out eventually and him Love and Rubio could make a deadly combination once they all mesh together.

    I hope we re-sign pek and get a starting SG in the draft or free agency as well. You make a good point about this team though seems like we are good enough to win games we just don’t get the job done at the end. I really hope Love comes back for a few weeks so we can see what we actually have here in Minny.

  4. My wish come next season:

    Keep :
    AK
    Shrefvdk
    Steismaa
    Williams
    Cunningham
    Luke
    Barea

    Now make it happen!

    That leaves a lot to trade, who I don’t want to see them again.

    The marketing gimmick of having a pale team for Minnesotoans was clever and needn’t have been so risky. There’s spoiled participants in our NBA, and then there is spoiled I have not seen since highschool (30 years let’s say). These less than clever boys will cause a coach who is a life-long basketball man to have nothing to say other than I won’t do this again here. Not that I would wish this coach to be on one of my favorite teams. He’s also an 80% kind of guy to me.

    During the off-season, I won’t believe the two Russians will allow themselves to come back to this level of play. How will they get out of it?

    And Pek, what a surprise he is in for. If management could find a deal they would. He’s not going to get better. The most over-rated, soft big man.

    The blond guy was OK until his body gave out. Hanging around KL, he’s now at 80% and collecting money.

    Rubio found a shot, which I rarely see that change as quickly. He would be good in a slower league, probably not semi-pro here. Spanish Globetrotters. He’s uncanny on defense, but on offense his head is in the clouds.

    Most exciting player is Shrevdrd (sp?). I wonder if he will see himself putting up with the injustice playing overseas brings?

    Will management be bold two seasons in a row? Stayed tuned.

  5. The whole article is about how the T-Wolves did terrible… look at the score. It was only a 7 point game

  6. Brady, a random 9-1 run in the final three minutes of the game made the final score look closer than most of the game was after the first six minutes. Better to watch the game than just look at the final score.

Leave a Reply

*

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>