Roster Review: Dante Cunningham

Zach Harper —  May 30, 2013 — 7 Comments

We’re kicking off our offseason coverage here at A Wolf Among Wolves with a comprehensive roster review of the team from this past season, looking at how each player’s 2012-13 went and what we see for them going forward. One player a day for the next couple weeks, starting with the bench and rolling up to the starters.

Glue guy.

That’s a term we use in sports, right? As I understand it, it’s the guy that is willing to do whatever is needed for his team as a way to keep things together. When things are going poorly, he’s diving on the floor, flying in for rebounds, getting deflections, darting toward the basket, picking his teammates up, and showing all of the intangibles in tangible form. The adhesive of their impact on the game is supposed to keep a team from spiraling out of control.

That doesn’t always work out though. 

Dante Cunningham could be described as a glue guy. When the team was relatively healthy, he seemed to be the first player off the bench for the Timberwolves. Rick Adelman loved him and fans did too. He was the energizer for the Wolves. If the team needed a shot of adrenaline to the heart in order to get back into a game, he was Adelman’s go-to guy for that. If the team needed to keep a run going but give a big man a breather, Adelman trusted Dante to get in there and find a way to keep things rolling.

Guard a center? No problem for the 6’8″ forward. Guard a power forward that is a banger in the post? Cunningham will happily get low in his defensive stance and try to provide as much resistance as possible. Guard a small forward or even a top-notch wing scorer like Kevin Durant? He’s happy to put on his hard helmet (you know, let’s pretend those are the new shooting sleeves) and try to pester a guy he really shouldn’t have to defend. This is what DC did for Rick Adelman and his teammates; he sacrificed for whatever the team needed. That’s what glue guys do.

He isn’t unique, necessarily, in this role. Almost every team in the NBA, if not every team, has a player like this. They have a guy who can excel in a limited role in which he just has to play defense and be intelligently aggressive with the plays he tries to make. And that’s exactly how I’d describe what Dante Cunningham does on the offensive end of the court: he’s intelligently aggressive.

You rarely saw him dribble a basketball more than once on any given play. In fact, if he dribbled the ball even once it was a bit of a shock. He wasn’t someone that could get sucked into taking a bad shot. He ran pick-and-pop plays and if the jumper was there, he’d take it. If he needed to dive to the basket and make a play at the rim, he did it. He didn’t dribble. He didn’t try to thread the needle with passes. He just existed. For the first two months of the season, he existed in spectacular fashion.

Early on, it seemed like his midrange jumper was automatic. You expected it to go in, even if that’s really not even what the percentages told you would happen. He just seemed incredible at finishing plays, and they never seemed designed for him. He was just there to clean it up with his hustle. It was easy to glorify his position on this team because he always seemed to be the one the Wolves could rely on during a season of injury-induced turmoil. The truth was asking him to do more than the random hustle and subtle execution wasn’t something he was cut out for.

In the nine games Cunningham started, he was terrible at making shots. He shot 39.3% from the field as a starter this season. A lot of that came after a few injuries left him banged up but still managing to play. He was one of two players on the roster (Luke Ridnour being the other) that played in at least 80 games for the Wolves this past season. Even through back issues and other various nicks, he gutted it out and showed up to play. As the extended minutes piled up, his effectiveness seemed less consistent. He was one of many role players on the team asked to do more than he should. But he never seemed ticked off at what he was asked to do.

That’s what I’ll take away from Cunningham from this past season. He wasn’t perfect by any means and he certainly is someone I have trouble deciding whether or not I want him to get minutes over Derrick Williams (assuming they’re both around next season). Ultimately, talent wins out in this league and Williams certainly has more talent than Cunningham. But talent doesn’t always translate to someone who has earned minutes. You need players like Cunningham to just go out there and give effort no matter what, even if it doesn’t lead to success. He’s a potential spark plug.

Comedian Jeff Ross tells this story about when he was trying to figure out his comedy career. He was trying to parlay any momentum he had as a standup comedian into a booming career but was struggling to do so. He asked his friend Dave Chappelle for some advice and Dave responded with, “Stay your lane.” Whenever I look back at clips of Dante Cunningham from this season, the idea of “stay your lane” pops into my head. DC doesn’t try to do anything he can’t. He seems very aware of what he’s good at and what he isn’t good at and you rarely see him deviate from that formula.

That’s what glue guys do and Dante Cunningham was the Wolves’ glue guy this past season.

Zach Harper

Posts

7 responses to Roster Review: Dante Cunningham

  1. No mention of the mouthguard? That’s gotta be his defining feature right?

  2. IMO “glue guys” are good for around 10 more wins in any given year (provided the team stays relatively healthy) and are vital to getting better positioning in the playoffs. Dante was a favorite of mine this past season and I hope he sticks around.

  3. The effectiveness of some role players is difficult to evaluate, but not with DC. When a backup PF has multiple game-sealing steals like he did, that shows not only was he good enough to be on the floor but also that he wasn’t afraid of the moment. I don’t know how well he and Stiemsma work as a tandem, but that probably puts Stiemsma’s future in more jeopardy than his. I’m not totally sure if DC’s the best possible backup to Love because he’s not a shotblocker or lockdown defender, but he’s a valuable player, and it’s surprising he’s moved around so much.

  4. I have to be honest, I was sad when the Wolves did not resign Anthony Tolliver last year. I thought he was the “glue guy”. And even though I never personally me AT I just liked the guy. But DC was the right choice between the two and obviously one of the guys you can point to and say helped make the difference in a few games last year. I think he is a no brainer to bring back. We’ll see where Derrick plays next year. I still believe Derrick Williams is going to be a very good player and I also think that next year very well could be the breakout year we are all expecting him to have.

  5. I like Daunte for his hustle, but I found myself cringing every time he took a midrange jumper because I almost knew it was going to be a brick. I would like him back but only if it is written into his contract that he agrees to never shoot another jumpshot unless there is no other alternative.

  6. Dante shot 40% on midrange shots. That’s pretty good. Not sure why you’re cringing.

  7. Dante is ChrisBosh-Lite. A little more hustle and a little less of everything else. I agree that I’d love to see him stay on the team but not at the expense of DWill’s minutes. He is excellent in short bursts and would remain an excellent option for 10-15mins a game, especially if he extends his range to the corner three.

Leave a Reply

*

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>